Spoiler: They Make Babies

BINGO!

Posted in General Talk by firstmatejess on April 5, 2010

Reader M.W. recently sent me a little box, packed to the brim with slim Signet and Harlequin volumes.  I’d never read category romance before.  With a hand-picked selection, though, how could I resist?  I’ve been gobbling them up at a breakneck speed — I’ve read five of them since March 19th, in between reading regular mass-market romances and writing my dissertation — and absolutely loving the indulgence.

Category romances distill the appeal of the romance novel.  Instead of attempting to appeal to a broad crowd through nuanced interpersonal interactions, category romances go straight for the prize.  A category romance is likely to give you a heroine who is soundly abused by her family and friends, but who maintains a flabbergasting meekness in the face of it.  One of the romances I recently read, The Youngest Dowager, had a heroine who believed that assault was normal during sex.  Yes!  I know!  AMAZING!

Since these books are thin, I can read them even more quickly than I do regular romances.  It goes even faster, because the books rely on well-trodden tropes of historical romance.  The minute a “gypsy” shows up, I know there’s going to be some brooding, or at the very least some Gypsy Superpowers.  I can fly right over the words, secure in the knowledge that everything is as it always is.

It’s that last phrase, thought idly to myself mid-read, that made me realize just how much these books rely on stereotypes to support their narrative.  The maids are plucky and friendly and Irish, for example, because the heroine needs her hair fixed and a confidant who won’t blab to the ton.  It reminded me of the point I’ve made to my students time and again: stereotypes serve a narrative purpose in our lives.  One of the benefits of reading these romances is that it makes visible to me the stereotypes I rely on or am encouraged to rely on as a white middle-class woman.  I may not be the ideal reader of these romances, after all, but I belong to the intended group.

So, because I am categorically incapable of taking things seriously, I made bingo cards featuring the tropes of historical romances.  Before you look at my frivolous offerings, though, check out these bingo cards based on conversations about marginalized groups:

Now, without further ado, Historical Romance Bingo cards:

"My wastrel older brother--" "BINGO!"

She rides astride: an excellent horsewoman, who even rides like a man!
Surprise!title!: out of nowhere, our hero inherits an earldom.
“It’s never been like that before!”: no man has ever performed cunnilingus on me before. Let’s get married.
Gowns upon gowns: endless gown descriptions. Usually accompanies a makeover.
“All the servants love her”: and she’s made of sparkle powder and derring-do.
Kinky menace: her dead gay husband was into flogging chickens with a cat.  THE FIEND.

"Aye, miss--" "BINGO!"

Hermit hero: he lives in a cave, away from the ravening masses, until our heroine — and her life-saving ladybits — show him how to live again.
Sickly friend: she’s a cripple, but at least she’s plucky!
Savages!: a non-white person or people who torture our hero.
Lawn: the female counterpart of superfine.
Lady Smartypants: the heroine is both pretty, abused by her family, and secretly a master chemist and Latin scholar.
Just her chemise: you know how, when you get rained on, you strip down to just your fine lawn chemise?  Yeah, like that.

Note that there is no square for black people.  That is because black people don’t exist.  LA LA LA CAN’T HEAR YOU.

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Mw said, on April 6, 2010 at 6:42 pm

    Mind you – those were the batch that I liked the least…. :)

    I think there needs to be a specific subcategory of gambler (step)father who sells her off to some secretly nice nobleman with bad reputation who “saves” her by accepting her fathers wager

  2. arovd said, on April 26, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    I demand a sentence synopsis for EVERY square! DEMAND, I tell you!

  3. arovd said, on April 26, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    also ‘lifesaving ladybits’ = WIN LOL


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: